Last modified by superadmin on 2023/05/22 16:29

Show last authors
1 {{toc/}}
2
3 = Goal =
4
5 The goal of this working group is to research, clarify, and document the process by which the Open Source Definition (OSD) can be updated. A secondary goal is to better understand and document what other information besides the OSD the OSI relies on to certify a license. //The working group does not intend to propose any changes to the OSD itself.//
6
7 = Start date =
8
9 (% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)TBD
10
11 = Initial members =
12
13 Working Group Co-Chairs: (% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:10.5pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)Benjamin Nickolls / Tobie Langel
14
15 Working Group Sponsor: Deb Bryant
16
17 OSI General Manager:
18
19 Other Contributors: Kevin Fleming, McCoy Smith, Richard Fontana, Justin W. Flory, Ben Hilburn, Josh Simmons, Amanda Brock.
20
21 = Resources needed by group =
22
23 //(mailing list, virtual server, budget, etc.)//
24
25 * (% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:10.5pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)Mailing list.
26 * (% style="color:#000000; font-family:Arial; font-size:10.5pt; font-style:normal; font-variant:normal; font-weight:400; text-decoration:none; white-space:pre-wrap" %)Archivable Github repo for project management.
27
28 = Deliverable that will be created =
29
30 //What will be the output/takeaway/resource created by this Working Group?//
31
32 * A process for submitting, approving, and possibly appealing changes to the OSD (possibly including a distinction between substantive changes and minor, editorial ones).
33 * A suggested implementation of that process using GitHub/GitLab/a self hosted Git server.
34 * A suggested versioning/release scheme (or deliberate lack thereof; the tip of the main branch is the //de facto// standard, “living standard” style).
35 * A set of recommendations about documentation of additional requirements (precedents / “case law”), to become OSI certified and a process to amend this documentation.
36 * Clarify the licensing terms of the OSD itself.
37
38 = Description of how that deliverable satisfies a part of OSI's mission =
39
40 //Please review the OSI mission and then provide how this effort will align with the OSI's mandate.//
41
42 Formalize the process around maintaining the OSD. Improves transparency and fairness.
43
44 = Target completion date =
45
46 //When will you have something that can be used. Please note that the Working Group may continue on to enhance or add new outputs, however a date must be provided indicating when a usable resource will be available to the OSI community.//
47 \\6 months after approval of the WG for a draft process to be submitted to the Board.
48
49 = Resources =
50
51 * //[[Is it time to revise the Open Source Definition?>>https://opensource.com/article/20/9/open-source-definition]]//, Richard Fontana, September 30, 2020, Opensource.com.
52 * [[SustainOSS Licensing Working Group>>https://sustainoss.org/working-groups/licensing/]]
53 * //[[Refactoring OSD: draft of OSD 1.9>>https://hackmd.io/@LuisVilla/OSD19Refactor]]//, Luis Villa, February 23, 2021.
54
55

Submit feedback regarding this wiki to [email protected]

This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 license
XWiki 14.10.13 - Documentation