Changes for page License Review Tool Requirements, Candidates and Selection
Last modified by Stefano Maffulli on 2021/08/14 00:21
edited by Chris Lamb
on 2018/06/20 23:19
on 2018/06/20 23:19
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. vmbrasseur1 +XWiki.lamby - Content
-
... ... @@ -5,7 +5,14 @@ 5 5 For now, simply list any requirements you believe this tool //should// have. After collecting potential requirements we can categorise them into actual-requirements, nice-to-haves, and not-actually-required. 6 6 7 7 8 -* (add requirements here) 8 +* Ability to submit a license for review 9 +* Being able to immediately identify the current state of review for a license (eg. "approved", "rejected", "new", "brb; being redrafted", "invalid", "rejected", etc.) 10 +* Ability to submit updated revisions of a license, without destroying previous ones or history 11 +* Ability to comment on a license in a general sense 12 +* Ability to comment on specific words/lines of a given draft of license 13 +* All comments and submissions are dated and named 14 +* Entirely separate discussions for each license 15 +* Canonical URIs for each license for review 9 9 10 10 == Candidates == 11 11 ... ... @@ -12,4 +12,12 @@ 12 12 What tools are candidates for this? For now simply list tools without regard to whether they meet requirements, as the requirements are still being collected. Please provide links to tools as applicable. 13 13 14 14 15 -* (add tools here) 22 +* Gitlab (self-hosted, Gitlab.org, etc.) 23 +* Github 24 +* Taigo 25 +* Etherpad + similar 26 + 27 +((( 28 + 29 +))) 30 +