Changes for page License Review Tool Requirements, Candidates and Selection
Last modified by Stefano Maffulli on 2021/08/14 00:21
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ 27 27 * Entirely separate discussions for each license 28 28 * Easy to learn/refresh by non-technical users 29 29 * Must not assume experience with specific technical tools (i.e. requirement to use git, XML, a specific programming language, etc.) 30 +* Tools should be open source 30 30 31 31 ((( 32 32 ... ... @@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ 36 36 37 37 * Ability to cross-reference a different comment in the same or different discussion 38 38 * Canonical URIs for each license for review 40 +* Low administrative overhead/hosted service (OSI does not have a good track record of hosting/maintaining new services) 41 +* Previous license review emails can be added so that all license reviews are in the same place (we may need to engage someone separately to complete a migration) 39 39 * Not mandatory to use the tool in order to participate in review, i.e., system integrates with an email workflow 40 -* Low administrative overhead (OSI does not have a good track record of hosting/maintaining new services) 41 -* Previous license review emails can be added so that all license reviews are in the same place 42 42 43 43 ((( 44 44