Changes for page License Review Tool Requirements, Candidates and Selection
Last modified by Stefano Maffulli on 2021/08/14 00:21
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -23,9 +23,10 @@ 23 23 * Ability to submit updated revisions of a license, without destroying previous ones or history 24 24 * Ability to comment on specific sections/words/lines of a given draft of license 25 25 * Ability to comment on a license generally 26 +* Ability to moderate discussions (including removing comments, editing comments, banning users) 26 26 * Time-stamping of all comments and submissions 27 27 * Entirely separate discussions for each license 28 -* Easy to learn /refreshby non-technical users29 +* Easy to learn and use by non-technical users 29 29 * Must not assume experience with specific technical tools (i.e. requirement to use git, XML, a specific programming language, etc.) 30 30 * Tools should be open source 31 31 ... ... @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ 37 37 38 38 * Ability to cross-reference a different comment in the same or different discussion 39 39 * Canonical URIs for each license for review 41 +* Machine-readable output from the license review process (text of the license + metadata such as Author, Date approved, Link to discussion, etc.) 40 40 * Low administrative overhead/hosted service (OSI does not have a good track record of hosting/maintaining new services) 41 41 * Previous license review emails can be added so that all license reviews are in the same place (we may need to engage someone separately to complete a migration) 42 42 * Not mandatory to use the tool in order to participate in review, i.e., system integrates with an email workflow