Changes for page License Review Tool Requirements, Candidates and Selection
Last modified by Stefano Maffulli on 2021/08/14 00:21
Change comment:
Added annotation on "Tools should be open source"
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. PamelaChestek1 +XWiki.pmasson - Content
-
... ... @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ 25 25 26 26 * Create a maintainable system for making machine-readable licenses available 27 27 * Create a complete, searchable database of all license-review emails 28 + 29 + 30 +The OSI would (% style="background-color: inherit; color: inherit; font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit;" %)execute each stage in turn, retaining the option to re-evaluate or even potentially terminate the project at the end of each stage. For example, if it turns out that we cannot identify a solution at the end of Stage 1, the OSI would end the engagement. 28 28 ))) 29 29 30 30 == Requirements for license-review process ==
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.pmasson - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Being an open source to listed included as a "Must have" but listed as "should be." Current practice is, any OSI hosted software is open source, however we use non-opensource software if third party services. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2020-04-30 17:17:07.578 - Selection
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Tools should be open source - State
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +SAFE - Target
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +LicenseReviewToolRequirements.WebHome